Op werkdagen voor 23:00 besteld, morgen in huis Gratis verzending vanaf €20

Legal argumentation

Reasoned dissensus and common ground

E-book Pdf met watermerkbeveiliging Nederlands 2024 1e druk 9789400114272
Direct te downloaden

Samenvatting

In legal argumentation, dissensus is the point of departure, consensus the endpoint. However, the relationship between dissensus and consensus in argumentation is more complex than it looks at first sight.

First, a fruitful debate presupposes not only a difference of opinion, but also commonalities of meaning and corresponding rationality criteria, that is, consensus or common ground. Second, legal argumentation does not always result in consensus. It also explicates and refines differences of opinion about the means of proof, methods of interpretation, or the values that should prevail. It follows that in legal discourse, dissensus and consensus are not only opposites, but also interconnected in a complex way.

Legal Argumentation: Reasoned Dissensus and Common Ground includes contributions from law, argumentation theory, logic and philosophical perspectives, discussing the intriguing interconnection between dissensus and consensus in legal argumentation. The insights may be of interest not only to experts in Legal Methodology, Argumentation Theory and Legal Evidence, but to judges, lawyers and law students as well.

Specificaties

ISBN13:9789400114272
Taal:Nederlands
Bindwijze:e-book
Beveiliging:watermerk
Bestandsformaat:pdf
Aantal pagina's:190
Druk:1
Verschijningsdatum:22-4-2024
Hoofdrubriek:Juridisch
ISSN:

Lezersrecensies

Wees de eerste die een lezersrecensie schrijft!

Inhoudsopgave

1 Does virtue deepen disagreement in law?
2 Legal interpretation and the risk account of scientific objectivity
3 What to do when experts disagree on judicial fact-finding?
4 The use of literary references in the justification of separate opinions
5 An introduction to the economic analysis of law as a legal theory in improving legal argumentation and judicial decision-making for IP law in Europe
6 Contextual contingency of social rules
7 Defeasibility: a contextualist view
8 Consensus in concepts? A brief exploration
9 Fallacies concerning linguistic argumentation in law
10 Probability clerks and probability judges. Or how to prevent probabilistic fallacies in court
11 The virtue of being disagreeable. Identifying disagreement about legal evidence
12 Robust evidential probability and reasonable doubt
13 The pragmatics of evidence discourse: arguments from ostension
14 The Rule of Law and its procedural implications
15 Forensic rhetoric and conflict resolution. Enforcing agreements through emotion

Managementboek Top 100

Rubrieken

Populaire producten

    Personen

      Trefwoorden

        Legal argumentation